Commonwealth v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
October 2012
most recently cited
2 district · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Latimore · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Commonwealth v. Saferian · Commonwealth v. Freeman · Spence v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that a false statement of fact was made; (2) that the defendant knew or believed the statement to be false when he made it; (3) that the defendant intended that the person to whom he made the statement would rely on it; and (4) that the person to whom the false statement was made did rely on it and, consequently, parted with property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Although couched in the form of a loan, the transaction could still result in a larceny by false pretense even if the defendant intended to repay the loan and even if the loan had been repaid; the gravamen of the charge is obtaining the funds by a false pretense and not whether there was present intent to repay or actual repayment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kessler“single, continuing, criminal impulse or intent ... pursuant to the execution of a general larcenous scheme”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cook v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.