48 Md. App. 185 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe · Robinson v. Board of County Commissioners · State v. Renshaw · Brown v. Fraley · Snead v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provides an orderly procedure to insure that each criminal defendant appearing before the court be represented by counsel, or, if he is not, that he be advised of his Sixth Amendment constitutional right to the assistance of counsel, as well as his correlative constitutional right to self-representation.” 401 Md. at 180-181 , 931 A.2d 1098 (quoting Wright v. State, 48 Md.App. 185, 191 , 425 A.2d 1385 , cert. denied, 290 Md. 724 (1981)). The Court held that the advisements required by Md. Rule 4-215(a) may be satisfactorily given to a defendant in a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.