48 Md. App. 30 - State v. Mines’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 1995
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Barker v. Wingo · North Carolina v. Alford · Texas v. Louisiana · State v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact of the matter is that Rule 746 and Art. 27, Sec. 591 do not cover this situation. The striking of the guilty plea here may be likened to the grant of a new trial by a trial court or a remand for a new trial by an appellate court. Neither the rule nor the statute prescribes within what period the trial shall be had in such circumstances; it is the first bringing of an accused to trial that is contemplated by both of them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall apply to all proceedings ... commenced [after November 16, 19791 and, so far as practicable, to all proceedings then pending.” (Emphasis added). Since we can see no compelling reason why it would not have been”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.