Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 MINN 140 - Willis v. Mabon

Willis v. Mabon’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
30
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably Bernheimer v. Converse (1907), Converse v. Hamilton (1912)

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 77 state decisions — followed in 30 states

2601892190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses Groves v. Robert Slaughter · Miller v. Marx · Thomas v. Owens · State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. · French v. Teschemaker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * The question in every case is whether the language of a constitutional provision is addressed to the courts or the legislature, — does it indicate that it was intended as a present enactment, complete in itself as definitive legislation, or does it contemplate subsequent legislation to carry it into effect? This is to be determined from a consideration both of the language used and of' the intrinsic nature of the provision itself. If the nature and extent of the right conferred and of the liability imposed is fixed by the provision itself, so that they can be determined by the examination and construction of its own terms, and there is no language used indicating that the subject is referred to the legislature for action, then the provision should be construed as self-executing, and its language as addressed to the courts.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Each stockholder in any corporation (excepting those organized for the purpose of carrying on any kind of manufacturing or mechanical business, shall be liable, to the amount of stock held or -owned by him/ is se.lf-executing,””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.