Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

48 Mo. 278

Boggess v. Cox

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1871

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1871-07-15

<p>1. Practice, civil — Judgment for costs — Appeal—Nonsuit.—A judgment for costs is not-a final judgment, and will not support an appeal or writ of error. And the rule holds, although the judgment was rendered on a nonsuit.</p> <p>Where a nonsuit is taken, in order to justify an appeal or writ of error the judgment should be formally set out, “that it is by the court therefore con'sidered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing by his writ, and that the defendant go thereof without day and recover of plaintiff his costs,” etc.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1871-07-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1927

16 state decisions

50187118801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wagner, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The District Court dismissed the writ of error in this case on the ground that, there was no final judgment rendered in the Circuit Court.

¶3Upon the trial the plaintiffs offered a deed in evidence, and it being excluded by the court, they took a nonsuit, with leave to move to set the same aside; and upon a motion to set the nonsuit aside being overruled they excepted, wherefore the court gave judgment against them for costs, 'and this was the only judgment rendered in this cause.

¶4It is well settled that a judgment for costs only is not a final judgment, and will not support an appeal or writ, of error. Nor is there any difference between a final judgment, rendered on a nonsuit and in any other case. Where a nonsuit is taken, in order to justify an appeal or writ of error the judgment should be formally set out, that it is by the court therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing by his writ, and that the defendant go thereof without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs,” etc.

¶5The action of the District Court' in dismissing the writ must therefore be affirmed.

The other judges concur.
/48/mo/278 · .json · Public domain