Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 NEB 243 - Riley v. Starr

Riley v. Starr’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 1962
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1962

7 state decisions

3018961900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A safe and perhaps the most satisfactory test, in all such cases, is whether the relation of the parties to each other as debtor and creditor continues. If it does, the transaction will be treated as a mortgage, otherwise not.” Citing Robinson v. Cropsey, 2 Edw. Ch. (N. Y.) 138; Wilson v. Giddings, 28 Ohio St. 554 ; 1 Jones, Mortgages (6th ed.), sec. 258.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.