Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 N.M. 232 - State v. Martinez

State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 1974
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 1974

14 state decisions

601944195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on DeGanay v. Lederer · Davy v. McNeill · De Ganay v. Lederer · Mora Y Ledon v. . Havemeyer · Arnold v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It does not curtail the consumption of liquor within the state, or affect the morals and welfare of its citizens. It practically confines the residents and citizens to purchasing in the local market, whereby they must pay local taxes, while non-residents and non-citi1 zens are exempt from both.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “means to deliver to a carrier for transportation. * * * * * * The word”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.