48 Ohio App. 2d 339 - State v. Wood’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably 68 Ohio App. 2d 151 - State v. Kent (1980), 34 Ohio App. 3d 339 - State v. Casale (1986)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCarthy v. United States · State v. Griffey · 12 Ohio St. 2d 67 - State v. Minamyer · 14 Ohio App. 2d 59 - State v. Poffenbaugh · State ex rel. Haynes v. Powers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Consequently, there is no evidence to consider, and the trial court was not required to determine whether a factual basis existed to support the guilty plea, prior to entering judgment on that plea.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although Criminal Rule 5(B) thus prescribes that a hearing shall be held within a designated period after arrest or service of summons, the failure to provide a hearing within that period does not entitle a defendant to an automatic dismissal of the charges against him. Rather, some timely and proper action by or on behalf of an accused must be initiated to secure the desired dismissal, and if an indictment is handed down before such action is taken, the right to a preliminary hearing is extinguished and the hearing need not be held.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““[A] person who has committed an offense, whose history, character, and condition reveal a substantial risk that he will be a danger to others, and whose conduct has been characterized by a pattern of repetitive, compulsive, or aggressive behavior with heedless indifference to the consequences.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.