State v. Strodes’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2020 · most notably State v. Maurer (1984), State v. Loza (1994)
3 federal appellate · 56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Smith v. Texas · State v. Bayless · United States v. Kelly · State v. Nolton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nless prejudice to the defendant or the systematic and intentional exclusion of a group is shown, we will not reverse a judgment because of minor and technical defects in jury-selection procedures.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[t]he state must prove, and the jury must find, that the killing was purposefully done. The number of shots fired, the places where the bullets entered the body, and the resulting wounds are all probative evidence of a purpose to cause death.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he array of veniremen need not reflect an exact cross section of the community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lundgren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.