Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 OHIOST2D 342 - State v. Caudill

State v. Caudill’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 85 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably State v. Veney (2008), State v. Ballard (1981)

5 federal appellate · 85 state decisions

270197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCarthy v. United States · 43 Ohio App. 2d 93 - State v. Buchanan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Informing him of and determining that he understands the effect of his plea of guilty or no contest, and that the court upon acceptance of the plea may proceed with judgment and sentence.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 3 Ohio App. 3d 234 - State v. Summers · State v. Mota, Unpublished Decision (7-21-2006)
  2. ““In accepting a written plea of no contest to a felony charge, the trial court must adhere scrupulously to the provisions of Crim. R. 11(C)(2).””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 36 Ohio App. 3d 4 - State v. Flint · 55 Ohio App. 2d 231 - State v. Hawk
  3. “Adherence to the provisions of Crim. R. 11(C)(2) requires an oral dialogue between the trial court and the defendant which enables the court to determine fully the defendant's understanding of the consequences of his plea of guilty or no contest.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Bassett, 90887 (10-30-2008) · State v. Windle, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.