Mooney v. Stringer’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission · 28 Ohio St. 2d 154 - State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial Commission · State ex rel. Mansour v. Industrial Commission · Rummel v. Flowers · State ex rel. Commercial Motor Freight, Inc. v. Stebbins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the industrial commission in any injury case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common pleas of the county in which the injury was inflicted or in wliich the contract of employment was made if the injury occurred outside the state. * * * < < # & # “ * * * The court or the jury under the instructions of the court, if a jury is demanded, shall determine the right of the claimant to participate or to continue to participate in the fund upon the evidence adduced at the hearing of such action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zavatsky v. Stringer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.