Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 OHIOST2D 41 - Bowman v. Davis

Bowman v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
22
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably Jackson v. Bumgardner (1986), Lovelace Medical Center v. Mendez Ex Rel. Mendez (1991)

11 federal appellate · 79 state decisions — followed in 22 states

57019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Doe v. Bolton · 251 Cal. App. 2d 303 - Custodio v. Bauer · Gleitman v. Cosgrove

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The choice not to procreate, as part of one's right to privacy, has become (subject to certain limitations) a Constitutional guarantee. See Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), 381 U.S. 479 , 85 S.Ct. 1678 , 14 L.Ed.2d 510 ; Roe v. Wade (1973), 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 ; and Doe v. Bolton (1973), 410 U.S. 179 , 93 S.Ct. 755 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 . For this court to endorse a policy that makes physicians liable for the foreseeable consequences of all negligently performed operations except those involving sterilization would constitute an impermissible infringement of a fundamental right."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A third issue, that appellees’ damages should be limited to the expenses of the pregnancy after a negligently performed sterilization, was not raised at the appellate level. To the extent that this issue is not settled in our discussion of appellant’s other propositions of law, we decline to decide it. * * *” (Citations omitted.) (Emphasis sic.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “indemnity agreements purporting to release a party from the consequences of his negligence and failing to express that intent in `clear and unequivocal' terms to be unenforceable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.