Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 OR 309 - State v. Richardson

State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
6
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably 3 Cal. 5th 347 - People v. Valencia (2017), 51 Cal. 3d 744 - Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Political Practices Commission (1990)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 34 state decisions

90190619101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Hall et al. · Hughes v. State of Oregon · Sandys v. Williams · State ex rel. Bloxham v. Gibbs · York v. Nash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When, on appeal from a decree in equity, the cause is sent back because the complaint is considered insufficient or the evidence inadequate to support a material averment, no final decree is rendered in this court, except to set aside the decree of the court below and to require further proceedings to be had therein. The rule, therefore, as promulgated in Powell v. Dayton S. G.R. Ry. Co. , 13 Or. 446 ( 11 P. 222 ), applies only to suits in equity. Under the authority in Powell v. Dayton S. G.R. Ry. Co. , this court has the power to reverse the decree of the court below and remand the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Adams v. Kennard

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.