Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 P3D 311 - Disciplinary Proceeding Against Carmick

Disciplinary Proceeding Against Carmick’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 156 Wash. 2d 196 - In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Poole (2006), In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Vanderbeek (2004)

1 district · 58 state decisions

480200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 747 - Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Curran · 100 Wash. 2d 88 - In Re Noble · 103 Wash. 2d 192 - Wright v. Group Health Hospital · 99 Wash. 2d 515 - In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlen · 119 Wash. 2d 357 - Bohn v. Cody

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Unchallenged findings of fact made by the hearing officer and affirmed by the Disciplinary Board will be accepted as verities on appeal.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Carmick's conduct during the ex parte proceeding ... [was] the most serious of the violations.... While we consider all alleged violations of the RPCs with great seriousness, we view misrepresentations to the court in ex parte proceedings with particular disfavor. The duty of candor in an ex parte proceeding directly influences the administration of justice. We cannot, and will not, tolerate any deviation from the strictest adherence to this duty. In the simplest terms, an attorney in an ex parte proceeding who knowingly misrepresents to a judge the ex parte order is known to the opposing party and approved by that party shall be subject to discipline.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “As the only body to hear the full range of disciplinary matters, the Board has the opportunity to develop unique experience and perspective in the administration of sanctions. We should not lightly depart from recommendations shaped by this experience and perspective.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.