Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 PACOMMW 21 - Sun Oil Co. v. Commonwealth

Sun Oil Co. v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2014

10 state decisions

8019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Houff Transfer, Inc. v. Commonwealth · Gardner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review · Stevens v. Commonwealth · Sorge v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review · Landry v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It was entirely proper for the Board to have accorded weight to [the employee's] testimony, that, considering the sensitivity of the language directed at him coupled with the gesture toward an unseen device and prior threats, he feared an imminent attack on his person. A reasonable belief of imminent bodily harm and feared danger of an assault justifies reasonable retaliatory force."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"had been fired for fighting with another employee after having struck the first blow. The referee concluded that his discharge was the natural consequence of fighting on company property and that that was an obvious breach of a duty owed to the employer and inimical to the employer's best interest."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.