Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 SO2D 409 - Koningh v. Knecht

Koningh v. Knecht’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1966
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on E. Marqueze & Co. v. LeBlanc · Carroll v. Powell · Delacroix v. Barrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But the garnishment process is certainly a suit; there must be a petition and citation to get the garnishee before the court, and then follows a judgment in accordance with the evidence. If the garnishee confesses that he or she is indebted, either expressly or by making default, a judgment will be entered up against the party so confessing.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.