Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 SO3D 1058 - Griffith v. Latiolais

Griffith v. Latiolais’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 708 So. 2d 731 - Evans v. Lungrin · 452 So. 2d 1161 - Succession of Lyons · Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. · 32 So. 3d 380 - Griffith v. Latiolais · Gasway v. Cellxion Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[j]oint custody obligates the parents to exchange information concerning the health, education, and welfare of the child and to confer with one another in exercising decision-making authority.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Pursuant to the 1993 Revisions to the child custody provisions, joint custody is no longer presumed to be in the best interest of the child; however, it is mandated unless (1) there is an agreement between the parents to the contrary which is in the best interest of the child, or (2) one parent shows by clear and convincing evidence that sole custody to that parent would serve the best interest of the child. [La.Civ.Code] art. 132. “Clear and convincing” evidence is applied in civil cases only in exceptional circumstances, “where there is thought to be special danger of deception, or where the court considers that the particular type of claim should be disfavored on policy grounds.” Talbot v. Talbot, 03-814 (La.12/12/03), 864 So.2d 590, 598 (citing Succession of Lyons, 452 So.2d 1161, 1165 (La.1984) and McCormick on Evidence, § 340(b), p. 798 (2d ed.1972)). “The clear and convincing standard requires a party to prove the existence of a contested fact is highly probable, or much more probable than its non-existence.” Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “normally include decisions concerning major surgery or medical treatment, elective surgery, and schools attended, but not the day-to-day decisions involved in rearing a child, e.g., bedtimes, curfews, household chores, and the like.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.