¶1Joe Nathan Willingham challenges his convictions and sentences for aggravated battery with a firearm causing great bodily harm and shooting at, within, or into a vehicle. We affirm his convictions and sentences without further comment. We remand for the limited purpose of correcting a scrivener’s error which appears on the face of the written judgment. Although the record reflects that Willingham was convicted after a jury trial, the written judgment erroneously indicates that he entered a no contest plea. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to correct this error. See Newson v. State, 867 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
48 So. 3d 173
Willingham v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 24, 2010
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-11-24
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2015
10 state decisions
Relies on 867 So. 2d 603 - Newson v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2010-11-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →