Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 So. 3d 692 - Ransone v. State

48 So. 3d 692 - Ransone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 452 So. 2d 938 - Martin v. State · Ransone v. State · 744 So. 2d 1256 - Tharpe v. State · 491 So. 2d 547 - Florida Bar v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant convicted of two or more offenses charged in the same indictment, information, or affidavit or in consolidated indictments, informations, or affida- ' vits shall serve the sentences of imprisonment concurrently unless the court directs that two or more of the sentences be served consecutively. Sentences of imprisonment for offenses not charged in the same indictment, information, or affidavit shall be served consecutively unless the court directs that two or more of the sentences be served concurrently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when, pursuant to section 921.161(1), a defendant receives pre-sentence jail-time credit on a sentence that is to run concun'ently with other sentences, those sentences must also reflect the credit for time served_We distinguish this situation from one in which the defendant does not receive concurrent sentences on multiple charges; in such a case the defendant “is not entitled to have his jail time credit pyramided by being given credit on each sentence for the full time he spends in jail awaiting disposition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.