Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

48 So. 3d 902

Pylant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 27, 2010

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-10-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2020

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-10-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Cecil Edwin Pylant appeals the judgment and sentence entered after he pleaded guilty to attempted sexual battery. We affirm, but remand for the trial court to strike one order.

¶2When Mr. Pylant entered his plea, the trial court entered an order finding him to be a violent felony offender of special concern who poses a danger to the community. There is no dispute that this order was incorrect. Mr. Pylant brought this error to the trial court’s attention by filing a motion to correct sentencing error. The trial court granted the motion and removed this designation from the judgment and sentence and order of probation; however, the trial court failed to strike the order. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to strike the order finding him to be a violent felony offender of special concern who poses a danger to the community.

¶3Affirmed; remanded with instructions to strike the order.

ALTENBERND, WALLACE, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
/48/so3d/902 · .json · Public domain