Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

48 S.W.2d 413

Kuntz v. Spence

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1931

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1931-11-14

Relies on Clonts v. Johnson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-11-14

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1980

4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

60193119401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing.

¶2In their motion for rehearing, appellants now pray for our consideration as one of their assignments of error here the following alleged error embodied in their motion for new trial in the court below: “The court erred in entering up judgment in this case for the sum he did enter same because said judgment is excessive and not warranted by the evidence introduced on the trial hereof.”

¶3That assignment was not brought forward in appellants’ briefs, filed here, but they now for the first time pray that the same be considered by this court and that by reason thereof the judgment of the trial court be reversed independently of other assignments of error.

¶4Under the rulings of our Supreme Court in Clonts v. Johnson, 116 Tex. 489, 294 S. W. 844, and Natkin Engineering Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 37 S.W.(2d) 740, that assignment has been waived by appellants, and cannot now be considered.

¶5*422And, after due consideration of all other grounds therein contained, the motion of appellants for rehearing is overruled.

/48/sw2d/413 · .json · Public domain