Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 SW2D 730 - Lewis v. Harris

Lewis v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1966
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Austin v. Cahill · Sansom v. Mercer · Shelley v. Nolen · Tax Collector v. Finley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"As applied to different situations, the phrase `convenience of the people,' as used in the Constitution may have different meanings, but in our opinion it cannot properly be construed as imposing upon a commissioners' court the absolute duty of rearranging the boundaries of commissioners' precincts, from time to time, so as to accord to each precinct representation upon and power of control of the commissioners' court in proportion to their respective populations, voting strengths, and taxable valuations. * * *"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The decisions in this state, and the great weight of authority in other jurisdictions, recognize an exception to the general rule that discretionary acts will not be reviewed or controlled exists when the discretion has been abused by arbitrary action. 38 C.J. 598, § 74, and cases cited; Sansom v. Mercer, 68 Tex. 488 , 5 S.W. 62 , 2 Am.St.Rep. 505 ; King v. Guerra (Tex.Civ.App.) 1 S.W.2d 373 . Vanlandingham v. Hill, 47 S.W.2d 641, recently decided by this - court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`Mandamus will not lie to control or review the action of an official or board upon matters involving the exercise of discretion or judgment confided to such official or board.' Lewis v. Harris, supra, 48 S.W.2d at page 732 ; 28 T. J. (Mandamus), Sec. 33.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.