Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 TENNAPP 482 - Rutledge v. Swindle

Rutledge v. Swindle’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Karr v. Taxing District of Shelby County · Haley v. Doochin · Hardin v. Williams · Garrett v. Perryman · 20 Tenn. App. 290 - Shirley v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no hard and fast rule by which to determine whether laches has barred the remedy, but each case must depend upon its own peculiar facts. What period will constitute “a reasonable time” within the meaning of the rule laid down, is a question for the judicial discretion of the court in most cases, and its exercise of that discretion will not be revised, if not abused; but no unreasonable diligence will be required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.