Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 Tex. Civ. App. 441 - Chancey v. Allison

48 Tex. Civ. App. 441 - Chancey v. Allison’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
January 1952
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1952

17 state decisions

60190819101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute does not prescribe any form of affidavit to a petition for injunction, and when the petition, as in this case, is signed by the plaintiff, and there is appended thereto the jurat of a proper officer certifying that it was subscribed and sworn to before him, the verification is sufficient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.