Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 U.S. 1 - Luther v. Borden

Luther v. Borden’s Empirical Analysis

48 U.S. 1 · 1849

Citation profile

459
cited by 459 later decisions
87
cited 87 times by the Supreme Court
36
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

84 federal appellate · 53 district · 113 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 459 later decisions (87 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Baker v. Carr (1962), Flast v. Cohen (1968)

84 federal appellate · 53 district · 113 state decisions — followed in 36 states

5501849185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Houston v. Moore · Asa Green v. The Lessee of Henry Neal · Shelby · United States v. Grundy and Thornburgh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 459 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(t)he United States shall guarantee to every State a Republican Form of Government”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union, a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion and on Application of the Legislature or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “"Much of the argument on the part of the plaintiff turned upon political rights and political questions, upon which the court has been urged to express an opinion. We decline doing so. The high power has been conferred on this court of passing judgment upon the acts of the State sovereignties, and of the legislative and executive branches of the federal government, and of determining whether they are beyond the limits of power marked out for them respectively by the Constitution of the United States. This tribunal, therefore, should be the last to overstep the boundaries which limit its own jurisdiction. And while it should always be ready to meet any question confided to it by the Constitution, it is equally its duty not to pass beyond its appropriate sphere of action, and to take care not to involve itself in discussions which properly belong to other forums." 7 How. (48 U.S.) at 46-47, 12 L.Ed. 581 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.