Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 Va. App. 271 - Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth

48 Va. App. 271 - Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cartera v. Commonwealth · Noll v. Rahal · King v. Sowers · Grubb v. Hocker · Com. v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, she did not agree that psychiatric diagnoses are usually made by psychiatrists, again stating that psychologists, licensed professional counselors, and licensed clinical social workers are trained to use the DSM. At the conclusion of the evidence, the jury found Fitzgerald guilty of the charged offenses. [3] Fitzgerald perfected an appeal to the Court of Appeals. A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Giles' testimony because”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the therapeutic process of . . . conducting assessments and diagnoses for the purpose of establishing treatment goals and objectives and . . . to identify and remediate mental, emotional or behavioral disorders and associated distresses which interfere with mental health.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a person trained in counseling interventions designed to facilitate an individual's achievement of human development goals and remediating mental, emotional, or behavioral disorders and associated distresses which interfere with mental health and development.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.