48 Va. App. 380 - Venable v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Malloy v. Hogan · Kastigar v. United States · Minnesota v. Murphy · Lefkowitz v. Turley · Spevack v. Klein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[A] witness protected by the privilege may rightfully refuse to answer unless and until he is protected at least against the use of his compelled answers and evidence derived therefrom in any subsequent criminal case in which he is a defendant,” and, “if he is nevertheless compelled to answer, his answers are inadmissible against him in a later criminal prosecution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.