48 Wash. App. 257 - State v. Chichester’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2001
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · United States v. Matlock · Sedillo v. United States · Arkansas v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not mean to imply by our decision that the "common authority" rule only applies where the person giving consent to enter and search is present, and the nonconsenting party is absent . . . Where an occupant with an equal right to privacy in the premises acts in her own self-interest to allow seizure . . . her consent is effective, even if the other occupant has not been given an opportunity to consent. See State v. Frame, 45 Or. App. 723 , 609 P.2d 830 (1980); People v. Cosme, 48 N.Y.2d 286 , 397 N.E.2d 1319 , 422 N.Y.S.2d 652 (1979) [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Leach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.