48 Wash. App. 279 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2010
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · 51 Cal. 2d 777 - People v. Mattson · 91 Wash. 2d 603 - State v. Gilcrist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general rule, proof of venue is necessary in a criminal prosecution. [Citations omitted.] However, venue is not an element of the crime [citations omitted], and it need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt [citation omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vejvoda“the situation where there is reasonable doubt whether the offense has been committed in one of two or more counties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rockl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.