Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 Wash. App. 531 - State v. Johnson

48 Wash. App. 531 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2016

19 state decisions

901987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whalen v. United States · 101 Wash. 2d 664 - State v. Rupe · 82 Wash. 2d 577 - State v. Roybal · 95 Wash. 2d 15 - State v. Alexis · 101 Wash. 2d 113 - State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Legislature has crafted a plan by which each person sentenced is given an "offender score" according to his prior criminal record. RCW 9.94A.360. The statute takes careful account of each prior felony conviction . . . and assigns weight to them ... It would be utterly inconsistent with this detailed plan to construe the statute so that a defendant who had committed and been sentenced separately for several serious crimes over a period of years, but who happened to serve overlapping prison terms for them at the same time, would be deemed to have committed only one offense. We are confident that the Legislature's true intent was to include one offense in criminal history when prior concurrent sentences were judicially imposed for more than one offense, regardless of whether the concurrent sentences arose out of the same or separate incidents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hile there were two clerks in the store, nothing was taken directly from the clerks. The only items stolen were items for which each clerk had equal responsibility with the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “be absurd and one that would serve no useful purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.