Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 WASHAPP 66 - State v. Hoskinson

State v. Hoskinson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
September 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Richardson v. Marsh · Douglas v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him . . .".”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “"In criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right ... to meet the witnesses against him face to face . . .".”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.