Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 Wash. App. 734 - Morse v. Williams

48 Wash. App. 734 - Morse v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2015

6 state decisions

401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 100 Wash. 2d 409 - Lyon v. Lyon · Rogers v. Rogers · Stevenson v. Stevenson · 23 Wash. App. 767 - Newell v. Ayers · Greenwood v. Beeson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Funds on deposit in a single account belong to the depositor. (2) Funds on deposit in a joint account without right of survivorship and in a joint account with right of survivorship belong to the depositors in proportion to the net funds owned by each depositor on deposit in the account, unless the contract of deposit provides otherwise or there is clear and convincing evidence of a contrary intent at the time the account was created.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that joint accounts with right of survivorship transfer interests at death only; i.e., they do not give a nondepositing party any present interest in the account funds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “all property shall pass without probate to either one of us who shall survive the other”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.