48 Wash. App. 95 - State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 88 Wash. 2d 221 - State v. Wanrow · 105 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bergeron · 106 Wash. 2d 547 - State v. Armstrong · 42 Wash. App. 78 - State v. Wood · 375 So. 2d 1333 - State v. Lozier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of burglary in the first degree if, with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, he enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling and if, in entering or while in the dwelling or in immediate flight therefrom, the actor or another participant in the crime (a) is armed with a deadly weapon, or (b) assaults any person therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“So I'm going to find that you went into the building lawfully, upon invitation, that while you were lawfully in the building you — your mind's purpose, or your purpose, changed to one of an unlawful nature, an intent to either rape or to assault, and that constitutes unlawfully remaining within the building under the context of RCW 91.50.020 [sic].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The State also argues the victims invited Mr. Collins in for the limited purpose of using the telephone and he exceeded the scope of that consent by sexually assaulting the victims. However, the consent given by Charlotte was unqualified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.