48 Wis. 2d 612 - State v. Maker’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

cited by 29 later decisions

states following

May 2002

most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2002 · most notably 73 Wis. 2d 400 - State v. Killory (1976), Commonwealth v. Sees (1978)

27 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. O'Brien · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Cox v. State of Louisiana · Schenck v. United States · 31 Wis. 2d 110 - Lock v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[i]t is the combination of conduct and circumstances that is crucial in applying the statute to a particular situation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 60 Wis. 2d 54 - State v. Elson · 170 Wis. 2d 576 - State v. Migliorino
“violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, unreasonably loud or otherwise disorderly conduct in which the conduct tends to cause or provoke a disturbance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 157 Wis. 2d 91 - State v. Von Loh · 60 Wis. 2d 668 - State v. Werstein
““ ‘ * * * The statute does not proscribe activities intertwined with protected freedoms unless carried out in a manner which is violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous or unreasonably loud, or conduct similar thereto, and under circumstances in which such conduct tends to cause or provoke a disturbance. * * * ’ ” State v. Maker, 48 Wis.2d 612, 616 , 180 N.W.2d 707, 708-709 (1970). (Emphasis in the original.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Pederson v. Breier

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.