Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 F.2d 1024 - Rainbow Line, Inc. v. M/v Tequila (Ex Linglee), Her Engines, Tackle, Boiler, Equipment, Etc. Empire Commercial Corporation, Claimant-Appellant

Rainbow Line, Inc. v. M/v Tequila (Ex Linglee), Her Engines, Tackle, Boiler, Equipment, Etc. Empire Commercial Corporation, Claimant-Appellant’s Empirical Analysis

480 F.2d 1024 · 1973

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably State Trading Corporation of India Ltd v. Assuranceforeningen Skuld (1990), Amelia Zamora Demateos, Administratrix of the Estate of Theodore Reyes, Deceased v. Texaco, Inc. And Texaco Panama, Inc (1977)

23 federal appellate · 7 district ·

270197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co. · Lauritzen v. Larsen · Hellenic Lines Limited v. Rhoditis · Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The American law is clear that there is a maritime lien for the breach of a charter party, and because the damages sought to be recovered by [the charterer] are all of a maritime nature and flow directly from the breach of the charter, it has a maritime lien.”). . A charter party is a contract for lease of a vessel. An executory contract for lease of a vessel, or unexecuted charter party, does not give rise to a maritime lien. See 8 BENEDICT ON ADMIRALTY § 12.01 [C][l][c]. . Supplemental Rule C(6) was updated in December, 2000, and the term”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “although it would not matter in this case, we disagree with the court in Belvedere ... to the extent that it felt that a time charter was executory until the first cargo was loaded.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “maritime liens arise separately and independently from the agreement of the parties, and rights of third persons cannot be affected by the intent of the parties to the contract.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.