Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

480 F.2d 1221

Docket No. 73-1209.

Pauline Nenoff v. George M. Thompson

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued June 6, 1973. Decided July 13, 1973.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1973-07-13

2 counsel of record

Relies on Gill v. Allstate Insurance · 124 Ohio St. 669 - Cincinnati Ry. Supply Co. v. Continental Casualty Co. · 125 Ohio St. 423 - Shaweker v. Spinell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1973-07-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2013

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

3019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Kelsey D. Bartlett, Toledo, Ohio, on brief for plaintiff-appellant.

James R. Jeffery, Toledo, Ohio, of counsel. Spengler, Nathanson, Heyman, McCarthy & Durfee, Toledo, Ohio, on brief for defendant-appellee.

Before EDWARDS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and MOYNAHAN,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This is an action brought by appellant, the widow of a man who was killed while a passenger in defendant's car when it went out of control at an exit ramp of an expressway in Toledo, Ohio. The administratrix of the estate of the deceased had previously brought a wrongful death action in an Ohio state court in which a jury had found no cause for action. Subsequently appellant filed this action for loss of consortium in the federal court before a District Judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, asserting jurisdiction on grounds of diversity of citizenship.

¶2

The District Judge determined that under Ohio law her damages were limited to the two hours in between the happening of the accident and her husband's death. He thereupon dismissed the cause of action for lack of the jurisdictional amount of over $10,000.

¶4

A spouse may recover only for loss of consortium between the time of injury and death. . . . DeWitt v. Machine Co., supra, 25 Ohio St.2d at 41, 266 N.E.2d at 564.

¶5

Our examination of this record shows to a legal certainty that the claims are for less than the jurisdictional amount. Gill v. Allstate Insurance Co., 458 F.2d 577 (6th Cir. 1972).

¶6

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

*

Honorable Bernard T. Moynahan, Jr., Chief Judge, U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation

/480/f2d/1221 · .json · Public domain