Regina Lee Azar v. James R. Conley’s Empirical Analysis
480 F.2d 220 · 1973
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union of United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (1993), WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller (1997)
21 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Marshall v. Sawyer · Ruby v. Secretary of the United States Navy · Jung v. K. & D. Mining Co. · Regina Lee Azar v. James R. Conley · Firchau v. Diamond National Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n order which dismisses a complaint without expressly dismissing the action is [generally] not ... an appealable order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.