Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 F.2d 229 - United States v. Hodges

United States v. Hodges’s Empirical Analysis

480 F.2d 229 · 1973

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
5
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably United States v. Watson (1979), United States v. Espinosa (1985)

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

2901973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 321 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · White v. United States · United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co. · Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney · United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[t]he recorded conversation was not a ‘relevant statement’ under the meaning of Rule 16. It was introduced not as a part of the government’s case-in-chief, but on rebuttal. ... It was not admitted for its truth, but was admitted solely for the purpose of [impeachment]. . There was nothing in the statement which had any bearing on the substantive crimes charged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.