United States v. Hamlet’s Empirical Analysis
480 F.2d 556 · 1973
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2018
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act)
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · United States v. Hamlet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no serious possibility that appellant was legally insane at any time pertinent to the crimes committed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crutsinger v. Davis“the request for psychiatric services was ... lacking in merit”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crutsinger v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.