Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 F.2d 705 - Hetrick v. Martin

Hetrick v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

480 F.2d 705 · 1973

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
5
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Egger v. Phillips (1983), United States v. Moore (2000)

40 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

27019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Perry v. Sindermann · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Meyer v. State of Nebraska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not encompass the right of a nontenured teacher to have her teaching style insulated from review by her superiors . . . just because her methods and philosophy are considered acceptable somewhere within the teaching profession.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it does not require a University or school to tolerate any manner of teaching method the teacher may choose to employ. A University has a right to require some conformity with whatever teaching methods are acceptable to it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “and argued the First Amendment protected her from termination for using teaching methods and adhering to a teaching philosophy that are”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.