Ottis Mayo Jones v. Gertrude Bales

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Feb. 21, 1973.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1973-02-21

4 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · United States v. One 1961 Red Chevrolet Impala Sedan, Serial No. 11837A177369 · Jones v. Bales

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1973-02-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably Hostrop v. Board of Junior College District No. 515 (1975), Green v. McKaskle (1986)

60 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ottis Mayo Jones, pro se.

Gertrude Bales, pro se.

Louis C. Woolf, Knoxville, Tenn., and John E. Dougherty, Atlanta, Ga., for Cheatham and Waggoner.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for Kirksey and Taylor.

Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the reasons stated and authorities cited in the final order, Jones v. Bales, N.D.Ga.1972, 58 F.R.D. 453.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I