Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 F.2d 88 - Ganz v. Bensinger

Ganz v. Bensinger’s Empirical Analysis

480 F.2d 88 · 1973

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
6
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably King v. United States (1974), 77 Wis. 2d 166 - Bruneau v. State (1977)

18 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

20019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Goldberg v. Kelly · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The Sixth Amendment] does not broadly encompass every proceeding which may result in a deprivation of liberty or property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The briefs of both parties persuasively indicate that even if the presence of counsel may be desirable at parole release hearings, a lawyer is not indispensable to the effective conduct of such hearings. Unlike the actual importance of a transcript on an appeal from a criminal conviction, or the participation of counsel in the appellate process, this rule of the Illinois Parole Board, in the words of Justice Frankfurter, does not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(s)ince the arguments favoring the appointment of counsel certainly have no greater force as applied to a parole release hearing than to a parole revocation hearing, this holding requires rejection of plaintiff's due process argument”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.