Fair v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis
480 F.3d 865 · 2007
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2024
11 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Stuart v. General Motors Corp. · Wallace v. DTG Operations, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[g]iven lack of any apparent relationship between [plaintiff's] allegations of sexual harassment . . . and the basis of her complaint [of racial discrimination] to the EEOC”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McNeil v. Metro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.