Comer v. Schriro’s Empirical Analysis
480 F.3d 960 · 2007
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. United States · Gregg v. Georgia · Teague v. Lane · Murray v. Carrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“underst[ood] that the merits of his habeas appeal are legally strong ... but that he wished to halt his legal challenges even so”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“thorough findings, including its finding that Comer understood his legal claims”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.