Davis v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Estelle v. Gamble · V. C O Churner · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · Kost v. Kozakiewicz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen an originally named party and the parties added are represented by the same attorney, the attorney is likely to have communicated to the latter party that he may very well be joined in the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Semcrude, Lp“actual, constructive, implied or imputed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Semcrude, Lp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.