Commonwealth v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2022
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Opinions of the Justices to the House of Representatives · L.L., a juvenile v. Commonwealth · Barry v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Jones-Pannell · Opinion of the Justices to the Senate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An excludable delay under rule 36 (b) (2) (A) (v) is calculated as the time between 'the date on which the request for hearing on the pretrial motion is filed, or, if no such request is filed, from the date the hearing is ordered, until the conclusion of the hearing.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“justify the delay, either by showing that it falls within one of the 'excluded periods' enumerated under rule 36 (b) (2) or by showing that 'the defendant acquiesced in, was responsible for, or benefited from the delay.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The determination whether a defendant acquiesced in delay is often retrospective, and therefore requires 'a thorough examination of the record'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.