Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 NW2D 358 - Marshall v. Galvez

Marshall v. Galvez’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. · Borough v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. · Schore v. Mueller · Stahlberg v. Moe · Clifford v. Peterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An error in jury instructions is fundamental or controlling if it destroys the substantial correctness of the charge as a whole, causes a miscarriage of justice, or results in substantial prejudice on an issue vital in the litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.