Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

480 P.3d 837

Mcgee (Anthony) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2021

Nevada Supreme Court · decided 2021-02-18

Relies on Lozada v. State

Decided 2021-02-18

        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA


ANTHONY MCGEE,                                            No. 82186
                          Appellant,
              vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
                  Respondent.
                                                                 FILED
                                                                 FEB 18 2021
                                                               ELIZABETH A. BROWN
                                                             CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
                                                            BY
                      ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

            This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and a district
court order for revocation of probation and amended judgment of conviction.
Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Stefany Miley, Judge.
            Initial review of the notice of appeal revealed a potential
jurisdictional defect. The judgment of conviction was entered on December
19, 2019, and the order revoking probation and amended judgment of
conviction was entered on October 27, 2020. The notice of appeal was not
filed in the district court until December 2, 2020, well after expiration of the
30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b) for the judgment of
conviction, and 2 days after expiration of the 30-day appeal period for the
order revoking probation and amended judgment of conviction.
Accordingly, this court ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal
should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
            In response, appellant concedes that the notice of appeal was
untimely filed but notes that there is a pending motion for reconsideration
of revocation of probation in the district court. Appellant has also filed a
motion to dismiss this appeal without prejudice. He asserts that the district
court will not hear argument on the pending motion for reconsideration
because of this appeal. Appellant requests that this appeal be dismissed
                 without prejudice so that appellant may reinstate this appeal if the district
                 court does not alter the probation revocation.
                             This court lacks jurisdiction over an untimely notice of appeal.1
                 Lozada v. State, 
110 Nev. 349, 352
, 
871 P.2d 944, 946
 (1994). Accordingly,
                 this appeal is dismissed. The motion to dismiss this appeal without
                 prejudice is denied. Appellant may file a new notice of appeal if the district
                 court enters a new appealable order. To the extent appellant asks that this
                 appeal be treated as an appeal under NRAP 4(c), the request is denied.
                             It is so ORDERED.




                                                                    , J.
                                         Cadish




                 Pickering                                  Herndon




                 cc:   Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court
                       Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 23
                       Legal Resource Group
                       Attorney General/Carson City
                       Clark County District Attorney
                       Eighth District Court Clerk




                       1To the extent appellant suggests that the motion for reconsideration
                 tolled the time to file the notice of appeal, this contention lacks merit.
                 NRAP 4(b)(3) sets forth the tolling motions in criminal appeals—a rnotion
                 for reconsideration is not among those motions.
SUPREME COURT
      OF
   NEVADA


(0) 1947A 4460                                         2

/480/p3d/837 · .json · Public domain