Collins v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Agis v. Howard Johnson Co. · American Road Serv. Co. v. Inmon · 447 So. 2d 133 - Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Bowen · Rice v. United Ins. Co. of America · Cates v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Defendant, John Williams, as referenced herein, engaged in irreprehensible [sic] conduct in contacting Dr. Carpenter and in intentionally and maliciously interfering in the business relationship be tween Dr. Carpenter and [Thomas]. As such, [Williams’s] conduct was so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized society. “By virtue of [Williams’s] conduct, Plaintiff, Teresa Thomas, has sustained damages and suffered losses, including being subjected to severe emotional distress.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. Williams““The allegations in the counterclaim and upon which Collins based her claim of outrage relate to breach of contract and negligent performance of the contract and, therefore, do not rise to that level of ‘extreme and outrageous conduct’ required by our cases and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, supra. Consequently, Collins’s tort of outrage count does not state a claim for which relief can be granted. Hence, the trial court did not commit reversible error by dismissing [Collins’s tort-of-outrage claim].””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.