480 So. 2d 1277 - Curtis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably 488 So. 2d 62 - Williams v. State (1986), 626 So. 2d 1325 - Atwater v. State (1993)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ivory v. State · 232 So. 2d 451 - Slinsky v. State · 455 So. 2d 1090 - Curtis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he right to participate, set forth in Ivory , includes the right to place objections on the record as well as the right to make full argument as to why the jury request should or should not be honored.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Paige v. State · Woods v. State“so fraught with potential prejudice that it cannot be considered harmless.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“and both the state and the defendant must have the opportunity to participate, regardless of the subject matter of the jury's inquiry. Without this process, preserved in the record, it is impossible to determine whether prejudice has occurred during one of the most sensitive stages of the trial. (Emphasis in original). 480 So.2d at 1278-79 . Because I would reverse this case for new trial, I do not reach the other issues presented which deal with the propriety of the reasons given by the trial court to support a”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.